MoveOn.Org Lies Again. You Can Always Count on Them.

6 Key Phrases Used by Unreasoning Agents of Destruction

During my return to college (2001-2004), I had the opportunity to take a Speech and Debate class. We were blessed with a very conservative and fair minded professor who really just wanted us to learn and hone our debate skills, regardless of the topic. She was one of those who revelled in having one of us eloquently crush our opponent in class, and then demand that the winner turn around and debate from the opposing view. 

I often deliberately chose highly controversial topics because debating was not enough for me; I also wanted to be right, in an environment that was predominantly Liberal. So, I developed several topics for discussion that were sure to draw heated debating partners. The following came from some of those topic studies.

My summation is that I am providing a public service to all by handing out these free tips. We must often be reminded that the Liberal mind is one that is twisted and skewed to operate without the constraining influence of solid structure. Theirs is a fantasy world without constraint of resources. Much like the Star Trek world created by Gene Roddenberry, in their minds The Great Society should provide for all equally so that all can pursue true happiness towards whatever destination that might be. And, anyone holding to the antiquated theories of hard work for a day's pay in order to gain, is only good for the menial labor necessary to provide for the physical maintenance of real of society; their society.

So it was that I learned many years ago that Liberals do not have to be convinced; they just have to be defeated. So, when you run into someone using the words below in a way that suggests that they might be a liberal, don't waste too much time trying to convince them of Truth and The Rule of Law. Just defeat them at the polls every two years.

This obviously is only a partial list.
EDITOR

You might be a Liberal if… you don’t get any of this.

PROGRESSIVE

• Meaning; “I am using thought processes beyond your ability to understand anything important.”
• Example; “I have moved beyond The Rule of Law. The US Constitution is too confining and narrow. I take a more progressive view.”
• Reality; Liberals must willingly overlook and ignore The Rule of Law in order to follow their agenda. It does not bother them one whit that they are destroying the very foundations that provide them the safe intellectual harbor in which they are existing. 

LIBERAL (in politics)

• Meaning to the Liberal; To take from the endless richness of the American Government coffers and give to all who are hurting or in need.
• Meaning to everyone else; Being liberal (loose) with The Rule of Law in order to meet whatever agenda is convenient at the time.
• Example; “It’s not fair that some have and some do not. The rich have no right to hoard so much wealth at the expense of the poor.”
• Reality; To forcefully convert ownership of someone’s goods and make it to be owned by someone else is illegal. There is a name for that crime. It is called Theft. The act of being liberal with tax generated funds while redistributing wealth makes it no less of a Theft. 

CONSERVATIVE (in politics)

• Meaning to the Liberal; A person who is mean spirited, money-grubbing, selfish, hateful, narrow-minded, racist, bigoted homophobic and challenged to anything that smells of change.
• Meaning to everyone else; to hold closely to the fundamental meanings of founding documents and statutes. 

HOMOPHOBIC

• Meaning to the Liberal; To be fearful of and hate persons who hold to the alternative lifestyle known as Homosexuality.
• Example; Usually an accusation made against anyone who claims to be a Christian or believe in The Bible. 

TOLERANCE

• Meaning to the Liberal; “Everyone should be tolerant to my beliefs.”
• Meaning to everyone else; Everyone should show measured tolerance towards all reasonable beliefs.
• Example; Liberals commonly are the first to jump to any public accusatory demands whenever a Conservative might be publically disagreeing with a Liberal ideology. 

RACIST

• Meaning to the Liberal; For a white person to disagree for any reason with a black person.
• Example A; “It doesn't make any difference that Obama’s official birth certificate has been investigated by duly appointed government officials and deemed a forgery. Just investigating his birth certificate was a racist action because Barrack Obama is black.”
• Example B; Many black people and leftists believe that a black person can not commit a racist act or make a racist statement, simply because they are black. Being black exempts them from racism. While debating in a college class in Chicago in 2001, my debate opponent (a nice black lady) actually claimed that I was in error in my description of the meaning of racism because if I were correct, “…it would mean that a black person was capable of committing a racist act, which is impossible; because they are black. Black people can’t be racist, because they are black, so it’s impossible. ‘Cause they’re black…” etc
• Example C; Not a week goes by in today’s pop media circus that someone’s defense of a claim being made against our black president must be racist because “Obama is black.”
• Reality; From Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language; 2012. “Definition of RACISM
• 1  : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
• 2  : racial prejudice or discrimination
• — rac·ist  noun or adjective

My personal favorite that sums up the elitist frame of mind that must be acquired in order to follow the Western Liberal way of life, is a quote I created from a combination of something from the American Humorist, George Carlin, mixed with my own understanding of western culture.

“All men are created equal. Some are just more equal than others.”

EDITOR

Extrapolating to the Ultimate Conclusion; Look Around and See the Enemy

Political hay making or Christian love? Which do I choose when deciding how to treat the enemy?

A commentary by editor of RightPaparazzi, Stu Marks.

http://monoguru.deviantart.com/art/good-vs-evil-123033177

Since it is now clear that Barrack Hussein Obama and his minions are the enemy, it can safely be said that those who support them, or fight against those who hinder their destructive course, are also the enemy.

The enemy is all around me. We might outnumber the enemy, me and my neighbors, but identification is a problem, since the enemy is often well identified by the Obama/Biden bumper stickers, but many choose not to bumper sticker their car, like myself.

Another identification issue is that it is very clear that loud and obnoxious people are more easily identifiable than the more dignified and subtle. And since The Left is certainly way more Hillaryesque than Reaganesque, The Left carries a more concentrated if not broader manifestation; especially with the overwhelming presence of the Leftist press.

But, I want to make a difference, and furthermore, I hate the smug attitude that exudes from those touting the elitist carriage of destruction that they perceive as being, “The right thing to do” in their politically IN-correct little universe. Smacking that glib, cigarette besmirched grin off their face would feel so good for several seconds.

So, what is one to do? How do I treat these usually completely oblivious communists who support the destruction of all that I hold dear, while I’m ordering coffee, making change, passing them on a highway, washing the car, vacationing, taking my glass/paper/plastic to the recycle center or dropping the kids off at school?

My answer should not be taken as if the delivery of this information is coming by way of one who has arrived. I am often so angry at things that I hear coming from parts Left, when listening to The News on my truck radio, right as I have a slow moving Saab pull out in front of me as they toss their smoking butt out the window, that I wish for a set of extra heavy duty State Police push bars welded to the front of my truck for tactical use in cases such as this.

However, the answer can be found in Proverbs 25, verses 21 and 22.
21 If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
22 For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the Lord shall reward thee.

Now, there are a few different opinions of what God means by “…heap coals of fire upon his head…”. But it doesn’t sound like a pleasant thing to me. So, if it gets me rewards from God, and at the same time visits hot coals on their heads by simply being civil and kind, then I’m all for it. It beats the dull feeling I get by exacting immediate revenge upon them, and then worrying about where my car is parked all night and if there will still be air left in the tires the next morning.

Because, there is something we’ve all learned about The Left. Left to themselves, they are evil and vindictive. They slash tires, rip off Bush bumper stickers, break windows, spit on people (and worse) and look for opportunities to destroy property and cost as much hard earned money as possible for those who do not agree with their tolerant and elite way of life. Case in point (which is actually thousands of cases in point, which is all we need here); the Occupy crowd.

Compare Tea Party events to Occupy events. This is a great sociological study opportunity between two diametrically opposed cultures. After Righty Tea Party events, grounds, buildings, and facilities are left in better condition. On the other hand, after Lefty Occupy events, thousands of dollars in damage is left behind as trash and damaged property must be dealt with by private and public ownership. Our Community Organizer in Chief really bit the big one on that go around. Great opportunity for the press to point out some very news worthy contrasts. Those Occupy days were made for journalistic reporting high on the visual scale, regardless of the press touting the non-news-worthiness of it all.

Kindness released where kindness is unlooked for delivers twice the punch of just regular old kindness. It also lowers the blood pressure of the kinder person, regardless of what it does to the kindee. So, I vote for kindness in the face of hate when dealing with Liberals, Statists, Communists, Occupiers, Democrats and all other haters of the American way and the rule of law.

The next time someone tears your conservative bumper sticker from off your vehicle, just cowboy up, grab a black grease pencil and draw a big ole smiley face where the partially torn sticker is still adhered. The next time the tearer sees and recognizes your bumper, who knows what positively pleasant destruction you’ll be delivering? And, nobody bites anybody.

Arguing with Liberals.

Arguing with liberals.

“It’s like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good I play, or how good I am at chess, or how accurate and true my moves are, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it’s victorious.”

Scott D. Weitzenhoffer
Paraphrased from a lengthy and inaccurate statement he made regarding arguing the failed theory of Evolution with Creationists, where he accurately describes how poorly liberals argue and debate, and then attributes these failings on the opposite side of the podium.

I just thought it the height of irony to use an ignorant, over-educated liberal’s oft quoted quip against the noble assemblage of elites who can only communicate intelligently as long as it is to their crowd asking the right questions. The come-back from liberals who are accused of these failings is often to merely prove my point by diffing deeper into the false facts they were handed in their Piltdown-peccary schools.

EDITOR

Words and Actions Have Consequences; Yes, even for Liberals

Principal Susan Wright at Michigan’s Schall Elementary School told the press she intended no disrespect when she forced a 3rd grader to have his parent applied army men removed from cupcakes meant for his class for a party, but words and actions both have cause and effect circumstances.

Icons have meaning, and removing the WWII toys from the cupcakes and accusing them of being anything less than what they are, a symbol of our brave warriors who gave their lives in battle for Freedom, sends a strong message; especially coming form a chief educator in a school who's responsibility it is to educate accurately about History.
RightPaparazzi..

Third grader’s birthday cupcakes with plastic army men deemed ‘insensitive’

Posted on March 9, 2013

At least he wasn’t suspended or charged with a hate crime.

Last week, a third grade boy at Michigan’s Schall Elementary School brought 30 cupcakes to school in celebration of his ninth birthday. The cupcakes were topped “with plastic army guys like the ones countless boys and girls have played with for decades,” reports WNEM.com.

But Principal Susan Wright stopped the boy from passing the treats out to classmates until the plastic army soldiers had been removed. Wright said the figures were “insensitive” in light of the recent Sandy Hook school shooting in Connecticut.  Wright called the boy’s father, Casey Fountain, personally to explain her reasoning.

But Fountain didn’t accept the explanation. He said the plastic figures represent WWII soldiers and have no relation to Sandy Hook, reports KCTV5.com.  We’d go even further: Not only were American soldiers not responsible for the Newtown massacre, but they risk their lives every day to protect innocent civilians from evil.

Any complaints about the toy soldiers from parents or students would have allowed school leaders to explain the contributions our fighting men and women make to preserving the American way of life.

Read more: http://savingourfuture.com/2013/03/third-graders-birthday-cupcakes-with-plastic-army-men-deemed-insensitive/#ixzz2N4BHsQTB