UN Resolutions Hold no Authority Over American Citizens

Only duly elected American officials who represent their constituents can be in the law making business for Americans. We did not elect ANYBODY in the U.N. to make decisions that affect U.S. laws.
Therefore, any elected U.S. government representatives, including the President of these united states, do not have the authority to take part in the un Constitutional actions at the U.N.

Go ahead and sign gun treaties Mr. Obama. I am importing those vintage rifles anyway and I am carrying my concealed or unconcealed side arm regardless.

One fights battles that need fighting regardless of the inevitable outcome.

I was told from a trusted pulpit in the Midwest that we should not try to fight our government if they try to come for our guns, because one cannot fight the police and the army with all of their armed might and artillery. He forgets that one does not fight important battles because he can win them. One fights battles that need fighting regardless of the inevitable outcome. It was with the courage of this spirit that America was founded.

If we surrender our guns, we are already dead or enslaved anyway. Let me die the death of the righteous and those to blame can face their own consequences.

The US Constitution Stands as The Rule of Law for Elected American Officials

U.S. Constitution Limits All Three Branches of Government, Especially the Executive.

Before all of the territories of our young nation ratified the Constitution and became States, they wanted a guarantee that America wasn't going to become simply a fresh monarchy like England. So, Jefferson and all the rest made sure to include language that assured that The US Constitution was mostly a limiting set of laws that held in check Congress, but mostly The Office of the President.

The POTUS represented to all of the territories the most dangerous element of the three branches because they were at that time fighting a battle against the monarchy of British Royalty.

So, our US President actually has even more checks and balances against his ability to act unilaterally than does Congress. Therefore, every time you see/hear of Mr. Obama side stepping The US Constitution and Congress, he is technically, practically and intentionally breaking The Law of the Land and showing his contempt for The Rule of Law and our hard won Liberty and Justice for all.

There is no legal condition under which The POTUS can thus operate unilaterally

EDITOR